Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)

Nupur Talwar vs Cbi & Anr on 7 June, 2012

4. Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the witnesses have disclosed that there were some theft from the shop of the petitioner. By way of referring chargesheet, he submits that in the chargesheet, materials are there to take cognizance under Sections 379 and 461 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that the revisional order is bad in law on the ground that it has been discussed in the revisional order that the order in question is not a final order and it is an intermediate order. By way of referring the judgment rendered in the case of Rajendra Prasad v. Bashir & others, reported in (2001) 8 SCC 522, he submits that the learned Magistrate is having power to take cognizance 3 in terms of provisions as contained in Section 193 Cr.P.C. He further relied upon the judgment rendered in the case of Nupur Talwar v. C.B.I., reported in (2012) 3 SCC 188 and in the case of SWIL v. State of Delhi & others, reported in (2001) 6 SCC 670.
Supreme Court of India Cites 63 - Cited by 491 - Full Document

Rajinder Prasad vs Bashir & Ors on 19 September, 2001

4. Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the witnesses have disclosed that there were some theft from the shop of the petitioner. By way of referring chargesheet, he submits that in the chargesheet, materials are there to take cognizance under Sections 379 and 461 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that the revisional order is bad in law on the ground that it has been discussed in the revisional order that the order in question is not a final order and it is an intermediate order. By way of referring the judgment rendered in the case of Rajendra Prasad v. Bashir & others, reported in (2001) 8 SCC 522, he submits that the learned Magistrate is having power to take cognizance 3 in terms of provisions as contained in Section 193 Cr.P.C. He further relied upon the judgment rendered in the case of Nupur Talwar v. C.B.I., reported in (2012) 3 SCC 188 and in the case of SWIL v. State of Delhi & others, reported in (2001) 6 SCC 670.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 108 - Full Document
1   2 Next