Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.24 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I vs Chetan Gupta on 12 August, 2016

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Chetan Gupta (2016) 382 ITR 630 (Del) has considered an identical issue and after analysing provisions of section 282(1) read with order 5 Rule 12 of CPC and order 3 Rule 6 of CPC held that notice required to be served u/s 148 has to be mandatorily served upon assessee in accordance with section 282(1) of the Act. The court further held that where prior to completion of assessment, assessee raised an objection that he had not been duly served notice in accordance with section 148, Proviso to section 292BB was attracted and revenue could not take advantage of main portion of section 292BB.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 45 - Full Document
1   2 Next