Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 41 (0.30 seconds)Section 16 in The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 18 in The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Section 19 in The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Ram Narain Arora vs Asha Rani & Ors on 31 August, 1998
21. Again in the case of Ram Narain Arora vs. Asha
Rani and others6, this Court had an occasion to consider
the aforesaid powers under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
This Court observed thus:
Harshavardhan Chokkani vs Bhupendra N. Patel And Ors on 28 February, 2002
In the case of Harshavardhan Chokkani vs.
Bhupendra N. Patel and others7, this Court had an
occasion to consider the scope of revisional power under
Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and
Eviction) Control Act, 1960. This Court observed thus:
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Dilbahar Singh on 27 August, 2014
24. Lastly, the Constitution Bench of this court in the
case of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs.
Dilbahar Singh8 had an occasion to consider the scope of
revisional powers as contained in the Kerala Buildings (Lease
and Rent Control) Act, 1965, T.N. Buildings (Lease and Rent
Control) Act, 1960 and Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and
Eviction) Act, 1973. The Court observed thus:
Shri Harish Tandon vs The Addl.District Magistrate, ... on 5 January, 1995
28. It could be seen, from the judgment and order of the
District Judge, that the District Judge has considered the
words “allowed to be occupied” in Section 12 of the U.P. Act,
34
1972 as interpreted by this Court in the case of Harish
Tandon vs. Addl. District Magistrate, Allahabad, U.P.
and others9.