Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.17 seconds)
D.V.Praveen vs The Chief Postmaster General on 25 February, 2010 cites

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

The respondents was fully justified in their reliance to the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi (supra) wherein it has been held that any appointment through side-door would be violative of the constitutional scheme of equality contained in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

Prashant C.M vs Assistant Superintendent Of Post ... on 26 November, 2009

6. They have also relied upon the order of this Tribunal in OA 417/09 - Prashant C.M. Vs. Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Trivandrum North Sub Division and others dated 26.11.2009 (Annexure R-1) in which it was held that unless a person fulfills all the conditions prescribed for appointment as casual labourer as envisaged in D.G.Posts letter dated 6.6.1988, he will not be entitled for any preference.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

D.Kaladharan vs Sub Post Master on 20 October, 2008

7. The applicant has filed a rejoinder stating that the direction of the High Court was to allow him to continue, if he is found honest and competent, considering the fact that he has been working for a long period and has already came out second in the process of selection for the same post. He has also relied upon the order of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in O.A.82/03 dated 23.7.2003 - D.Kaladharan Vs. Sub Post Master, Chavara and others. The applicant therein was working as GDS SV, previously designated as Extra Departmental Stamp Vendor. He was aggrieved by the move on the part of the respondents to terminate what he considered to be his provisional engagement as GDS SV, without considering him for alternate appointment. He has, therefore, sought a declaration that his service as Stamp Vendor Chavara Sub Post Office was not liable to be terminated except in accordance with the principles contained in Ss.25F and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act and to direct the respondents not to terminate his services except in accordance with the principles contained in the aforesaid sections. He has also sought a direction to the respondents to consider him for grant of alternate employment to the post of GDS SV Chavara or any other existing or future vacancy on termination of his provisional service as GDS SV,Chavara. This Tribunal declared that the applicant therein was provisionally appointed to the post of GDS SV, Chavara with effect from 12.9.1999 and that under the extant rules, instructions and orders he was entitled to all the benefits including alternate appointment available to a provisional employee facing termination of service.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1