Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.36 seconds)Section 10 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Amit Kumar Srivastava vs Indian Council Of Agricultural ... on 28 January, 2021
He further stated that the FAA while relying on the decisions of the
Commission in Shri. Satya Vijay Singh Vs. CVC CIC/SB/A/2015/00649
dated 08.02.2017 and Amit Kumar Srivastava vs CPIO, ICAR
CIC/ICARH/C/2021/612430 decided on 30,08.2022 held that the
information also stands exempted from disclosure as per Section 8 (1) (g) of
the RTI Act, 2005. He added that in most cases, the purpose is to find out the
identity of those officers who had taken favourable and those who had taken
unfavourable view of the conduct of such employees in recording the file-
notes. The employees are aware that it is these notes, which eventually lead to
decisions for, or against, them by the competent authority and want, for their
own different purposes, to gain access to the identities of those recording the
notes as well as the notes recorded to pursue their agendas about, or against,
the officers recording those notes. It has happened in a few cases that even
bona-fide comments made in such sensitive files by officers, when disclosed to
the person in respect of whom such comments were made, brought
retribution to the officer recording the note in the shape of a court proceeding,
a notice for damages and so on.
Shri K.L. Bablani vs Directorate General Of Vigilance, ... on 16 September, 2009
As regards to this, here, the decision of CIC vide No.
CIC/SB/A/2015/00649 dated 08.02.2017 in Shri. Satya Vijay Singh
Vs. CVC is referred to. Here, the CVC has disposed of a similar appeal
and reiterated its earlier decision in Case No. CIC/AT/A/2010/000757
dated 12.11.2010, wherein, the Commission has relied upon the case of
Shri K.L. Bablani v. DG Vigilance, Customs and Central Excise, New
Delhi, CIC/AT/A/2009/000617dated 16.09.2009, where the
Commission has held that:
Union Public Service Commission vs Shatmanyu Sharma on 10 October, 2013
In
this context, a reference can be made to the decision of the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi in its decision dated 7/10/2013 [W.P. (C) 4079/2013 Union
Public Service Commission vs. G S Sandhu] wherein it was held as under:
1