Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Surjit Sachdev vs Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt. ... on 1 February, 1997
25. According to learned Counsel for the Respondents, once these three elements are shown, a decree for possession must inevitably follow. Reliance in this regard was placed on Ved Prakash v. Marudhar Services Ltd. , Rajiv Sharma v. Rajiv Gupta , Ms. Mani Mann v. Smt. Ram Dulari , Surjit Sachdev v. Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt. Ltd. and Zulfiquar Ali Khan v. J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd. .
Mr. Zulfiquar Ali Khan And Ors. vs J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd. And Ors. on 7 March, 2002
25. According to learned Counsel for the Respondents, once these three elements are shown, a decree for possession must inevitably follow. Reliance in this regard was placed on Ved Prakash v. Marudhar Services Ltd. , Rajiv Sharma v. Rajiv Gupta , Ms. Mani Mann v. Smt. Ram Dulari , Surjit Sachdev v. Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt. Ltd. and Zulfiquar Ali Khan v. J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd. .
Baljit Kaljr vs United Insurance Company Ltd. on 19 September, 1997
21. There is no doubt that admissions for the purposes of Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC must be clear, unequivocal and unambiguous. This is settled by two decisions of this Court, namely, Baljit Kaur v. United Insurance Co. Ltd. 1997 VI AD (Delhi) 937 and Jagannath Chauhan v. S.C. Nanda 2000 VII AD (Delhi) 961.
Bhagwandas Parsadilal vs Surajmal And Anr. on 24 December, 1960
28. Reliance was also placed by learned Counsel for the Respondents on Bhagwandas Parsadilal v. Surajmal wherein it has been held as follows:
D.S. Parvathamma vs A. Srinivasan on 31 March, 2003
In this context, reliance was placed upon D.S. Parvathamma v. A. Srinivasan wherein the Supreme Court observed as follows:
Ved Parkash And Another vs M/S. Marudhar Services Limited And ... on 26 May, 2000
25. According to learned Counsel for the Respondents, once these three elements are shown, a decree for possession must inevitably follow. Reliance in this regard was placed on Ved Prakash v. Marudhar Services Ltd. , Rajiv Sharma v. Rajiv Gupta , Ms. Mani Mann v. Smt. Ram Dulari , Surjit Sachdev v. Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt. Ltd. and Zulfiquar Ali Khan v. J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd. .
Shri Rajiv Sharma And Anr. vs Shri Rajiv Gupta on 12 January, 2004
25. According to learned Counsel for the Respondents, once these three elements are shown, a decree for possession must inevitably follow. Reliance in this regard was placed on Ved Prakash v. Marudhar Services Ltd. , Rajiv Sharma v. Rajiv Gupta , Ms. Mani Mann v. Smt. Ram Dulari , Surjit Sachdev v. Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt. Ltd. and Zulfiquar Ali Khan v. J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd. .
1