Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)
Sanjay Vyas vs Block Medial Officer on 17 January, 2020 cites

Shailendra Kumar vs Divisional Forest Officer on 6 July, 2017

6. On due consideration of the law laid down in the case ofTrustees of H. C. Dhanda Trust (supra) and Shailendra Kumar (supra), we are of the view that the writ petition of the appellant was purely a petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India. The present appeal filed under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam is not maintainable. The writ appeal is accordingly, dismissed, as not maintainable.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 42 - Full Document

Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji vs State Of Gujarat & 6 on 13 April, 2016

In view of the latest Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Shailendra Kumar (supra), the law laid down by the three Judges Bench of the Apex Court in the case of of Radheshyam & another vs. Chhabi Nath & others (Civil Appeal No.2548/2009) passed on 26.02.2015 and the view taken by the Apex Court in the case of Jogendrasinghji Vijaysinghji vs. State of Gujarat & others reported in 2015 (9) SCC 1, we are of the view that the in the present case, against the order of Board of Revenue, no writ appeal is maintainable as the order passed by the Board of Revenue is not an original order.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 102 - A S Dave - Full Document

Jabalpur Bus Operators Association And ... vs State Of M.P. And Anr. on 17 December, 2002

He placed reliance on the decisions in the matter of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. vs. State of MP & others reported in 2018(1) MPLJ 72, Jabalpur Bus Operators Association & others vs. State of MP & others reported in 2003(1) MPLJ 513, Jaideve Siddha (Dr.) & others vs. Jaiprakash Siddha& others reported in 2007(3) MPLJ 595, Manoj Kumar vs. Board of Revenue & others reported in 2008(1) MPLJ 152, Shailendra Kumar vs. Divisional Forest Officer & another reported HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE W A No. 51 / 2019 SANJAY VYAS VS. BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER & ANOTHER
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 95 - Cited by 122 - Full Document

Dr. Jaidev Siddha And Ors. vs Jaiprakash Siddha And Ors. on 19 July, 2007

He placed reliance on the decisions in the matter of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. vs. State of MP & others reported in 2018(1) MPLJ 72, Jabalpur Bus Operators Association & others vs. State of MP & others reported in 2003(1) MPLJ 513, Jaideve Siddha (Dr.) & others vs. Jaiprakash Siddha& others reported in 2007(3) MPLJ 595, Manoj Kumar vs. Board of Revenue & others reported in 2008(1) MPLJ 152, Shailendra Kumar vs. Divisional Forest Officer & another reported HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE W A No. 51 / 2019 SANJAY VYAS VS. BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER & ANOTHER
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 42 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar vs Board Of Revenue And Ors. on 2 November, 2007

He placed reliance on the decisions in the matter of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. vs. State of MP & others reported in 2018(1) MPLJ 72, Jabalpur Bus Operators Association & others vs. State of MP & others reported in 2003(1) MPLJ 513, Jaideve Siddha (Dr.) & others vs. Jaiprakash Siddha& others reported in 2007(3) MPLJ 595, Manoj Kumar vs. Board of Revenue & others reported in 2008(1) MPLJ 152, Shailendra Kumar vs. Divisional Forest Officer & another reported HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE W A No. 51 / 2019 SANJAY VYAS VS. BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER & ANOTHER
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 50 - D Misra - Full Document

Trustees Of H.C.Dhanda Trust vs District Collector The State Of Madhya ... on 30 March, 2017

6. On due consideration of the law laid down in the case ofTrustees of H. C. Dhanda Trust (supra) and Shailendra Kumar (supra), we are of the view that the writ petition of the appellant was purely a petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India. The present appeal filed under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam is not maintainable. The writ appeal is accordingly, dismissed, as not maintainable.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 10 - V Rusia - Full Document

M/S Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. Thr. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 July, 2017

He placed reliance on the decisions in the matter of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. vs. State of MP & others reported in 2018(1) MPLJ 72, Jabalpur Bus Operators Association & others vs. State of MP & others reported in 2003(1) MPLJ 513, Jaideve Siddha (Dr.) & others vs. Jaiprakash Siddha& others reported in 2007(3) MPLJ 595, Manoj Kumar vs. Board of Revenue & others reported in 2008(1) MPLJ 152, Shailendra Kumar vs. Divisional Forest Officer & another reported HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE W A No. 51 / 2019 SANJAY VYAS VS. BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER & ANOTHER
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 8 - S Yadav - Full Document
1   2 Next