Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Indore Development Authority vs Manoharlal And Ors. Etc. on 6 March, 2020
7. Thereafter, the case was adjourned from time to time, awaiting the
decision of the Supreme Court which has now been delivered in Indore
Development Authority v. Manoharlal (supra).
Section 6 in The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The State Of Haryana vs Maharana Pratap Charitable Trust ... on 22 February, 2018
6. Notice of motion was issued by the Court on 10th December, 2008 and on
17th December 2008, status quo as regards possession was directed to be
maintained by this Court. The amendment to the writ petition to challenge
the notification dated 12th November, 2008 under Section 48 LAA was
allowed by an order dated 6th March, 2009 and the said notification was also
stayed by the same order. On 20th January 2016, an order was passed
adjourning the petition sine die with a direction to list it for hearing after the
Supreme Court decided Civil Appeal No. 4835 of 2015 (State of Haryana v.
Maharana Partap Charitable Trust). Subsequently, on account of an order
passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) CC No. 7788 of 2017 on 17th
April, 2017, this Court on 13th October, 2017, while allowing the application
filed by the Petitioners directed that the petition be listed for hearing on 30th
October, 2017.
Delhi Administration vs Gurdip Singh Uban And Ors on 20 August, 1999
8. A written statement was filed way back on 27th June, 2009 to the
amended writ petition by the Under Secretary, Financial Commissioner and
Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Industries and Commerce
Department. It is stated therein that the Petitioners did not file objections
under Section 5A LAA to the land acquisition proceedings and therefore, the
present petition is not maintainable in view of the decision in Delhi
Administration v. Gurdeep Singh Uban AIR 1999 SC 3822.
1