Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.43 seconds)Section 21 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Rajiv Shukla vs Gold Rush Sales And Services Ltd . on 8 September, 2022
Rajiv Shukla v. Gold Rush Sales & Services Ltd., (2022) 9 SCC 31 decided on 08.09.2022, wherein it was held as under:
M/S Narendran Sons vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. .3 ... on 7 March, 2022
Narendran Sons v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1760 decided on 07.03.2022, wherein it was held as under:
Lourdes Sty.Snehanjali Girls ... vs M/S H & R Jhonson(I) Ltd.& Ors on 2 August, 2016
Lourdes Society Snehanjali Girls Hostel and Ors Vs. H & R Johnson (India) Ltd. and Ors. ( 2016 8 SCC 286) decided on 02.08.2016, wherein it was held as under:
M/S. Goldrush Sales And Services Ltd. vs Rajiv Shukla & Anr. on 4 January, 2016
"In exercising of revisional jurisdiction the National Commission has no jurisdiction to interfere with the concurrent findings recorded by the District Forum and the State Commission which are on appreciation of evidence on record. Therefore, while passing the impugned judgment and order [Goldrush Sales and Services Ltd. v. Rajiv Shukla, 2016 SCC OnLine NCDRC 702] the National Commission has acted beyond the scope and ambit of the revisional jurisdiction conferred under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act.
Sunil Kumar vs Sbi Life Insu.Co.Ltd. on 12 November, 2022
Sunil Kumar Maity v. SBI, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 77 decided on 21.01.2022 , wherein it was held as under:
1