Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.94 seconds)

All India State Bank Officers ... vs Union Of India (Uoi), Central Board Of ... on 13 November, 2006

5. Based on the complaint, the sworn statement affidavit, the documents, by following the guidelines of Hon'ble Apex Court issued in 2014 AIR SCW 3462 between Indian Bank Association Vs. Union Bank of India, the court took cognizance of an offense punishable under Sec.138 of N.I. Act and ordered to be registered a criminal case against the accused for the offense punishable under Sec.138 of N.I. Act.
Bombay High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 6 - H L Gokhale - Full Document

Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010

In view of admission of the accused that, Ex.P1 to 3 and signatures thereon is belongs to the accused, the complainant has discharged the initial burden that, the cheques Ex.P1 to 3 and signature thereon are that of the accused, so, once it is proved, the initial presumption has to be drawn in favour of the complainant that, the cheques were issued towards discharge of legally enforcible liability, as per Sec.139, 118 (a) of N.I Act at this stage it is worth to note the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court between Rangappa v/s Mohan;
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 9567 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1