Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (1.49 seconds)Surinder Singh vs Punjab State Elect.Board,Patiala & Ors on 25 September, 2014
(Emphasis supplied)
Therefore, in the considered view of this Court, the issue
stands covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the
case of SURINDER SINGH (supra) and the judgment of
the Division Bench in the case of SMT. DIVYASHREE
(supra) and that of the co-ordinate Bench in Smt.
YOGESHWARI (supra).
Zaibatarannum vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2023
(i) The petition is hereby allowed and disposed of
in terms of judgment in Akshata Chougala
Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others, W.P.
No.23752/2022 dated 30.01.2023.
Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. Etc. on 16 November, 1992
(emphasis supplied)
It is apparent from the observations recorded by
this Court, as have been extracted hereinabove,
that the Office Memorandum dated 8-9-1993 had
been examined by this Court, specifically with
reference to the decision rendered in Indra
Sawhney case [Indra Sawhney v. Union of India,
1992 Supp (3) SCC 217 : 1992 SCC (L&S) Supp 1 :
Ram Kumar Gijroya vs Delhi Sub. Services Selection Bd. & Anr on 24 February, 2016
But this Tribunal following the
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in RAM
KUMAR GIJROYA v. DELHI SUBORDINATE
SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANOTHER
reported in (2016) 4 SCC 754, held that non-
submission of a reserved (OBC) category
certificate of the selected candidate within the cut
off date mentioned in the advertisement
cannot render a candidate ineligible for selection,
as it would amount to denial of equality of
opportunity contemplated under Articles 14, 15, 16
and 39-A of the Constitution of India and allowed
the application and the KEA was directed to include
the name of the Applicant in the said selection list
and to appoint the applicant
pursuant to the said selection list.
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bedanga Talukdar vs Saifudaullah Khan & Ors on 28 September, 2011
In a similar case relating to selection to the
post of Assistant Professor in History, one Renuka
had filed Application No.11680/2016 challenging
non-inclusion of her name in the selection list
dated 6.12.2016 on the ground that the Income
and Caste Certificate produced by her at the time
of making application was not valid; that since the
subsequent certificate was obtained after the last
date prescribed for receipt of applications, in view
the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
BEDANGA TALUKDAR v. SAIFUDAULLAH
KHAN, reported in (2010) 12 SCC 85 that strict
adherence to stipulated selection procedure is a
necessity, certificate produced subsequent to the
last date prescribed for receipt of applications
cannot be accepted.