Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)
Ramesh Kr Srivastava vs M/O Railways on 14 December, 2020 cites

Amar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 11 May, 2011

In view of the above discussion, the present O.A. is disposed off in the same terms as in OA No. 330/407/2017 - Amar Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors, with a direction to the respondents authority to proceed with the disciplinary enquiry after supplying copy of Disagreement Note to the applicant to enable him to submit his defence in a time bound manner and to conclude the proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 234 - Full Document

Punjab National Bank And Ors.The Chief ... vs Sh. Kunj Behari Misra, Sh. Shanti Prasad ... on 19 August, 1998

"...requirements of affording opportunity of hearing, as laid down in Kunj Behari Misra case, being in consonance with Art. 311 (2) and being a constitutional right to be heard, has to be read into a rule which does not makes specific provision to this effect. Disciplinary Authority before forming its final opinion, has to convey to charged employee its tentative reasons for disagreeing with the findings of the Enquiry Officer. Show cause notice issued in the present case to appellant with regard to proposed punishment, held, did not meet requirement of the law because final decision to disagree with the Enquiry Officer had already been taken before issuing show cause notice."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 929 - Full Document
1