Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.48 seconds)Section 135 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 135 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 154 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 166 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Manish Dixit And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 October, 2000
accused with the crime. True it is, about 15 to 20 persons had
gathered at the place of the incident, as stated by PW-3 Sanjay
Ragit, but none of them was used by prosecution as independent
witness, as well as no independent panch witness was taken for
the spot panchanama (Exh.12), but admittedly, as stated by PW-3
Sanjay Ragit, about 11 cases were registered by him against the
persons from village Keshegaon on relevant date i.e. 14.7.2006
and, therefore, as observed by learned trial court, nobody came
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 17:05:28 :::
18
forward from the same village to act as panch or to be
independent witness against the villagers from the same village
and, therefore, the view adopted by the trial court cannot be
faulted with, considering the observations made by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Manish Dixit (supra).
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1