Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.26 seconds)Section 50 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
N.Raveendranatha Reddy vs The Deputy Director on 27 January, 2022
15. Statement recorded by Assistant Director under Section 50
PMLA for this petitioner also enclosed in counter statement by the
respondent. The active participation on the part of this accused also prima-
facie reveals that he, knowing well the purpose of creation of the fake
documents he has involved in the present offence, as stated by the learned
Special Public Prosecutor. The petitioner/A22 is one of the main person and
he played active role with the prime accused person, so the authorities relied
on Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, in Crl.O.P.No.29533 of 2015
and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015, dated 27.01.2022, N.Raveendranatha Reddy
vs. The Deputy Director, by the petitioner, is not applicable to the facts of
the present case.
Section 45 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union Of India on 23 November, 2017
The above view stands fortified by the following
observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nikesh
Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India and Another [(2018) 11
SCC 1]: