Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)
All India Mobile Zoo Owners & Animal ... vs U.O.I & Ors. on 7 August, 2000 cites

M/S. Ivory Traders And Manufacturers ... vs Union Of India And Others on 20 March, 1997

4. Learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. Raj Panjwani, relies on the Full Bench decision in M/s. Ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors, and G.R. Simon & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., . He submits that in view of the Full Bench decision and the fact that the statute does not provide for any compensation being paid in respect of the animals, the holding and possession of which was not legal, the petitioner would not be entitled to any compensation. Learned counsel submits that nevertheless the respondent has averred in the reply that they are willing to consider the payment of ex gratia amount. Respondent No.2 in the reply to the application for grant of compensation has averred as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 100 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

G.R. Simon vs Union Of India on 20 March, 1997

4. Learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. Raj Panjwani, relies on the Full Bench decision in M/s. Ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors, and G.R. Simon & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., . He submits that in view of the Full Bench decision and the fact that the statute does not provide for any compensation being paid in respect of the animals, the holding and possession of which was not legal, the petitioner would not be entitled to any compensation. Learned counsel submits that nevertheless the respondent has averred in the reply that they are willing to consider the payment of ex gratia amount. Respondent No.2 in the reply to the application for grant of compensation has averred as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - M Sarin - Full Document
1