Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.28 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Ghisa vs Union Of India on 24 April, 1997
6. It is also required to be noted that with regard to submissions made as to the applicability of Sections 151 and 152 of CPC are concerned, the same were rejected by the Court in case of Ghisa v. Union of India (supra) by observing as under:-
Union Of India And Anr vs Pradeep Kumari And Ors on 10 March, 1995
3. The conditions in which the provisions of Section 28A of the Act can be invoked have been enumerated in the case of Union of India and Anr. v. Pradeep Kumari and Ors. :-
Babua Ram And Ors vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 4 October, 1994
2. So far as the applicability of Section 28A of the Act is concerned, the law is already settled by the Apex Court in the case of Babua Ram and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr. .
State Of Punjab vs Babu Singh on 16 April, 1991
In State of Punjab v. Babu Singh, 1995 Supp (2) 406 : 1995 LACC 425 SC, their Lordships have held:
State Of Maharashtra vs Maharau Srawan Hatkar on 21 February, 1995
14. So is the view taken in Union of India v. Rangilaram , State of Maharashtra v. Maharau Srawan Mathar, and UOI v. Pratap Kaur, . Expressly overruling resort to Section 151 of CPC their Lordships have held that after the award became final, the civil court was devoid of power or jurisdiction and there was no arithmetical or clerical error in the award. The civil court was devoid of jurisdiction and power to award or order additional benefits.
Union Of India vs Smt. Pratap Kaur (Dead) Through Lrs. & ... on 27 January, 1995
14. So is the view taken in Union of India v. Rangilaram , State of Maharashtra v. Maharau Srawan Mathar, and UOI v. Pratap Kaur, . Expressly overruling resort to Section 151 of CPC their Lordships have held that after the award became final, the civil court was devoid of power or jurisdiction and there was no arithmetical or clerical error in the award. The civil court was devoid of jurisdiction and power to award or order additional benefits.
Mewa Ram (Deceased) By His L.Rs. And Ors vs State Of Haryana Through The ... on 26 August, 1986
In Mewa Ram v. State of Haryana, 1987 SCC 45 : 1987 LACC 183 SC, a belated special leave petition was filed by the applicant seeking enhancement of rate of compensation in view of such enhanced compensation having been awarded by the Supreme Court in some other cases. It was held that it could hardly be a ground for condensation of delay and entertaining the Special Leave Petition. Their Lordships observed :