Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.25 seconds)Section 14 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
M/S. Boorugu Mahadev & Sons & Anr vs Sirigiri Narasing Rao & Ors on 18 January, 2016
b) Boorugu Mahadev and Sons and
another vs Sirigiri Narasing Rao and others
reported in 2016 (3) SCC 343
Sheela & Ors vs Firm Prahlad Rai Prem Prakash on 4 March, 2002
ii) The learned Senior Counsel contended that
the concept of ownership in landlord-tenant
litigation governed by rent control legislation must
be distinguished from that in a title suit. He relied
upon the Judgment reported in Sheela and
others vs Firm Prahlad Rai Prem Prakash
reported in 2002 (3) SCC 375.
Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 20 July, 1990
iii) Further, it is contended that oral evidence to
explain Ex.P2 was not permissible since there was
no ambiguity and he relied on the Judgment
reported in Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh vs State
of Himachal Pradesh and others reported in
1990 (4) SCC 320.
Sant Lal Jain vs Avtar Singh on 12 March, 1985
34. The Apex Court in Sant Lal Jain vs Avtar
Singh reported in AIR 1985 SC 857 held as follows:
Shashi Kapila vs R.P. Ashwin on 8 November, 2001
51. The Apex Court held in Shashi Kapila vs
R.P.Ashwin reported in AIR 2002 SC 101 as follows:
Kamaljit Singh vs Sarabjit Singh on 2 September, 2014
At any rate the legal postulation adumbrated in Section
116 of the Evidence Act is so well settled that no
54
decision be cited to further consolidate the same. A
Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Kamaljit
Singh vs Sarabjit Singh reported in 2014(16) SCC
472 is noticeable and the following passage is extracted
"17.
Gangabai W/O Rambilas Gilda vs Chhabubai W/O Pukharajji Gandhi on 6 November, 1981
a) Smt.Gangabai vs Chhabubai reported in
1982(1) SCC 4