Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.38 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008
Section 17 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Chairman, State Bank Of India vs M.J.James on 16 November, 2021
In State Bank of India v. M /s Kinship Services
(India) (P) Ltd. [2013 (4) KHC 21], a Division Bench of this
Court, considered the appeal filed against an interim order passed
by a learned Single Judge staying confirmation of sale till further
orders in respect of one item of property which is sought to be
WA Nos.3045 & 3046 of 2025 10 2026:KER:7931
sold in an auction scheduled in a proceedings under the provisions
of the SARFAESI Act.
M/S.Advani Oerlikon Ltd vs Machindra Govind Makasare & Ors. Ig on 17 March, 2011
13. The Bombay High Court in Advani Oerlikon Ltd. v.
Machindra Govind Makasare [AIR 2011 Bom. 84] while
considering the issue whether an appeal can lie under clause 15
of the letter patent against a decision of a Single Judge rendered
WA Nos.3045 & 3046 of 2025 13 2026:KER:7931
in the petition invoking Articles 226 /227 of the Constitution of
India, held thus:
State Of M.P. & Ors vs Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Ors on 10 October, 2007
In State Bank of India v. M/s. Kinship Services (India)
(P) Ltd. [2013 (4) KHC 21] a Division Bench of this Court,
after taking note of the judgment of the Apex Court in State
of Madhya Pradesh v. Sanjay Kerlaker [(2009) 17 SCC 766],
held that a writ appeal can be entertained under Section 5(i)
of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 against the interim order
dated 06.09.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in
O.P.(DRT)No.2931 of 2013, staying confirmation of sale till
further orders in respect of one item of property, which was
sought to be sold in the auction scheduled to be held on
11.09.2013 under SARFAESI proceedings, since the nature
of the interim relief granted by the learned Single Judge is
nothing but a discretion exercised under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India.
Mayurdhwarsinhji Mahendra Sinhji ... vs State Of Gujarat & on 22 November, 2013
11. Jogendra Sinhji Vijay Singhji v. State of Gujarat
[(2015) 9 SCC 1], the Apex Court held thus: