Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)

Rattan Singh Son Of Ramji Lal R/O Village ... vs Sandeep Minor Son Of Subh Ram Through Her ... on 7 August, 2012

Learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon 1989 PLJ 718, Ram Singh vs. Sukh Ram as well as another judgment of this Court in 1993 (2) RRR 628, Harbans Singh vs. Daulat Ram to submit that while dealing with a case where a decree of restoration of the possession of property is passed, the executing Court is competent to issue warrant of possession under Order 21 Rule 32 (5) CPC regarding property which was forcibly occupied by the judgment debtor.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 24 - K Kannan - Full Document

Narinder Singh vs Maya Devi And Ors. on 19 November, 1998

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a judgment of this Court rendered in CR No. 96 of 1998, decided on 19.11.1998, titled as Narinder Singh vs. Maya Devi, wherein this Court, while dealing with a decree of permanent injunction, has held that the warrant of possession cannot be issued and only warrant of attachment can be issued. On the face of it, the facts of this case are not applicable to the present case as in the case in hand, a decree of mandatory injunction directing the petitioner/defendant to hand over the vacant possession has been passed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - S Kumar - Full Document

Harbans Singh And Anr. vs Daulat Ram And Ors. on 27 April, 1993

Learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon 1989 PLJ 718, Ram Singh vs. Sukh Ram as well as another judgment of this Court in 1993 (2) RRR 628, Harbans Singh vs. Daulat Ram to submit that while dealing with a case where a decree of restoration of the possession of property is passed, the executing Court is competent to issue warrant of possession under Order 21 Rule 32 (5) CPC regarding property which was forcibly occupied by the judgment debtor.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1