Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.65 seconds)Section 3 in The Seeds Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 8 in The Seeds Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
Md. Allauddin Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2019
8. After going through the complaint and others documents, I am of the view that at this stage it cannot be said that commission of cognizable offence is not made out or there is any error legal or otherwise in the order passed by Court below against applicants. The allegations being factual in nature can be decided only subject to evidence. In view of settled legal proposition, no findings can be recorded about veracity of allegations at this juncture in absence of evidence. Apex Court has highlighted that jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. be sparingly/rarely invoked with complete circumspection and caution. Recently in Md. Allauddin Khan Vs. The State of Bihar and others (2019) 6 SCC 107, Supreme Court observed as to what should be examined by High Court in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and in paras 15, 16 and 17 said as under :
Section 6 in The Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 [Entire Act]
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Babulal Dewangan 11 Cra/1241/2000 The ... on 16 January, 2018
9. Recently, above view has been reiterated by Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 2020 (State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Yogendra Singh Jadaun and another) decided on 31.01.2020.