Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)

A.W. Travel & Logistic Services Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs (General), ... on 21 July, 2014

5. Likewise, it is stated that relevant documents pertaining to the other two exporters i.e. M/s Damini International and M/s Shiv Jyoti Sales Corporation, were also placed on record. Although the Inquiry Officer accepted the explanation with respect to M/s Shiv Jyoti Sales Corporation, it failed to take into account the explanation and documents pertaining to M/s Damini International in addition to M/s. Durga International. The learned counsel relied upon the judgment of this Court in Impexnet Logistic v. Commissioner of Customs (General) 5300 of 2016, decided on 01.06.2016 and Overseas Air Cargo Services v. Commissioner of Customs (General) CUSAA 8/2016, decided on 20.07.2016 to say that the time limit of 9 months CUSAA 2/2016 Page 3 of 6 within which the inquiry has to be completed under the CHA regulations; is absolute.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Overseas Air Cargo Services vs Commissioner Of Customs (General) New ... on 20 July, 2016

5. Likewise, it is stated that relevant documents pertaining to the other two exporters i.e. M/s Damini International and M/s Shiv Jyoti Sales Corporation, were also placed on record. Although the Inquiry Officer accepted the explanation with respect to M/s Shiv Jyoti Sales Corporation, it failed to take into account the explanation and documents pertaining to M/s Damini International in addition to M/s. Durga International. The learned counsel relied upon the judgment of this Court in Impexnet Logistic v. Commissioner of Customs (General) 5300 of 2016, decided on 01.06.2016 and Overseas Air Cargo Services v. Commissioner of Customs (General) CUSAA 8/2016, decided on 20.07.2016 to say that the time limit of 9 months CUSAA 2/2016 Page 3 of 6 within which the inquiry has to be completed under the CHA regulations; is absolute.
1