Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.67 seconds)
Dharamveer Tholia And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 10 August, 2000 cites

Chattar Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 24 September, 1996

He drew our attention to the certain observations made by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Chattar Singh's case (supra) and submitted that in view of law laid down by the Supreme Court, the contention of the petitioner that the list of successful candidates in the preliminary examination should be prepared on the basis of the merit of the candidates secured by them in the preliminary examination and should not be prepared category wise is wholly untenable in law. According to Mr. Joshi, the final merit is prepared in accordance with the scheme of the examination and only after holding the main examination and interviews as per Rule 17 of the Rules of 1999. It is submitted by the counsel for the RPSC that the Commission has given affect to the rule of its correct interpretation by the rule making authority in the State of Raj as than. It. is also submitted that Rule 15 does not speak about merit and does not lay down any restriction as Laid down in Rule 17 of Rules which speaks of preparation of merit list.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 79 - Full Document

Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. Etc. on 16 November, 1992

The Bench comprising of three Hon'ble Judges of the Apex Court while deciding the said writ petitions by a common Judgment held that the Creamy Layer as propounded in Indra Sawhney's case (Mandal Commission case) and Ashok Kumar Thakur case, is not backward and- therefore, not entitled to avail the benefit of reservation under Article 16(4). Since the conferring benefit to it under the said provision without excluding creamy layer from backward classes amounts to treating unequals as equals and equals as unequals, thus violating the principle of equality enshrined under Articles 14 and 16(1), which is the basic features of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 136 - Cited by 1429 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Jaskaran Singh vs State Of Punjab on 23 September, 1992

The learned Division Bench held that the candidates from the reserved categories, such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and OBCs are entitled to claim the said benefit only if they got higher merit position as entitling them to the seats from the general category. The scope of reserved candidates cannot be restricted only to the reserved seats. The ratio of the said decision as well as the other connected decisions, which have been advanced in this case, is not at all attracted since the controversy at issue raised in this writ petition and the connected matters are altogether different.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 154 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next