Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.65 seconds)

P.S. Ramamohana Rao vs A.P. Agricultural University & Anr on 31 July, 1997

4. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, the learned counsel for the appellant refers to the judgment in "P.S. Ramamohana Rao v. A.P. Agricultural University & Another" (1997) 8 SCC 350, "State of Haryana v. Ghasi Ram" 2014 SCC OnLine P&H 19333, order dated 9th August 2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17478 of 2008 title "State of Haryana & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.", order dated 10th December 2009 passed by Jharkhand High Court in W.P(S) No. 3163 of 2007 title"Dr. Gopal Mishra v. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D. Department, Ranchi & Ors." and the order dated 9th April 2021 passed by Calcutta High Court in WPA No. 3780 of 2015 titled "Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul v. the State of West Bengal & Ors" to submit that the appellant who is duly qualified for appointment on the post of a teacher could not have been excluded from consideration for the post of Headmaster.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 56 - M J Rao - Full Document

State Of Haryana & Ors. vs Ashok Kumar on 2 September, 2015

4. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, the learned counsel for the appellant refers to the judgment in "P.S. Ramamohana Rao v. A.P. Agricultural University & Another" (1997) 8 SCC 350, "State of Haryana v. Ghasi Ram" 2014 SCC OnLine P&H 19333, order dated 9th August 2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17478 of 2008 title "State of Haryana & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.", order dated 10th December 2009 passed by Jharkhand High Court in W.P(S) No. 3163 of 2007 title"Dr. Gopal Mishra v. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D. Department, Ranchi & Ors." and the order dated 9th April 2021 passed by Calcutta High Court in WPA No. 3780 of 2015 titled "Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul v. the State of West Bengal & Ors" to submit that the appellant who is duly qualified for appointment on the post of a teacher could not have been excluded from consideration for the post of Headmaster.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - S Gupta - Full Document

Gopal Mishra vs State Of Jharkhand on 3 July, 2019

4. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, the learned counsel for the appellant refers to the judgment in "P.S. Ramamohana Rao v. A.P. Agricultural University & Another" (1997) 8 SCC 350, "State of Haryana v. Ghasi Ram" 2014 SCC OnLine P&H 19333, order dated 9th August 2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17478 of 2008 title "State of Haryana & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.", order dated 10th December 2009 passed by Jharkhand High Court in W.P(S) No. 3163 of 2007 title"Dr. Gopal Mishra v. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D. Department, Ranchi & Ors." and the order dated 9th April 2021 passed by Calcutta High Court in WPA No. 3780 of 2015 titled "Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul v. the State of West Bengal & Ors" to submit that the appellant who is duly qualified for appointment on the post of a teacher could not have been excluded from consideration for the post of Headmaster.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Sri. Dibya Jyoti Paul vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 9 April, 2021

4. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, the learned counsel for the appellant refers to the judgment in "P.S. Ramamohana Rao v. A.P. Agricultural University & Another" (1997) 8 SCC 350, "State of Haryana v. Ghasi Ram" 2014 SCC OnLine P&H 19333, order dated 9th August 2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17478 of 2008 title "State of Haryana & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.", order dated 10th December 2009 passed by Jharkhand High Court in W.P(S) No. 3163 of 2007 title"Dr. Gopal Mishra v. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D. Department, Ranchi & Ors." and the order dated 9th April 2021 passed by Calcutta High Court in WPA No. 3780 of 2015 titled "Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul v. the State of West Bengal & Ors" to submit that the appellant who is duly qualified for appointment on the post of a teacher could not have been excluded from consideration for the post of Headmaster.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - A Sinha - Full Document

State Of Haryana vs Ghasitu Ram (Since Deceased) Through ... on 17 September, 2018

4. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, the learned counsel for the appellant refers to the judgment in "P.S. Ramamohana Rao v. A.P. Agricultural University & Another" (1997) 8 SCC 350, "State of Haryana v. Ghasi Ram" 2014 SCC OnLine P&H 19333, order dated 9th August 2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17478 of 2008 title "State of Haryana & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.", order dated 10th December 2009 passed by Jharkhand High Court in W.P(S) No. 3163 of 2007 title"Dr. Gopal Mishra v. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D. Department, Ranchi & Ors." and the order dated 9th April 2021 passed by Calcutta High Court in WPA No. 3780 of 2015 titled "Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul v. the State of West Bengal & Ors" to submit that the appellant who is duly qualified for appointment on the post of a teacher could not have been excluded from consideration for the post of Headmaster.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1