Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)
Aneesh Bansal & Anr vs Veerender Khatri & Ors on 21 September, 2016 cites

Shanti Devi vs Rajesh Kumar Jain & Anr on 9 October, 2014

14. The reliance of the learned counsel for the petitioners on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Shanti Devi vs. Rajesh Kumar Jain & Anr. (supra) is misplaced. In that case, the Supreme Court was dealing with a case where the landlord needed the property to expand his business as the space currently available with them was insufficient. Without going into the merits of the rival contention, the Supreme Court held that a triable issue has been raised. In the facts of the present case, it is significant that there is no accommodation available with the respondents from where he is carrying on said business.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Sanjay Chug vs Opender Nath Ahuja & Anr. on 6 January, 2014

15. Reference may be had to the judgment of this court in the case of Sanjay Chug vs. Opender Nath Ahuja & Anr. (supra). That was a case RC.REV.453/2016 Page 7 where the court came to the conclusion that the sons of the landlord were in possession of commercial accommodation from where they were operating their own business and that they needed an additional accommodation for setting up a new business or expanding the existing business. The judgment would not help the petitioners.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 21 - M Singh - Full Document
1