Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)Section 9 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Dr. G.H. Grant vs State Of Bihar on 30 March, 1965
In view of above discussion, the questions of law
framed in this case for adjudication has to be answered in favour of
the plaintiffs-appellants by holding that amount of compensation to
... 8
RSA No.665 of 2008
the extent of 80 per cent released to the plaintiffs-appellants on the
basis of their established possession by the Collector in the exercise
of powers under Section 11 read with Section 30, cannot be held to
be an act of fraud. In case any amount is held to have been wrongly
disbursed to the plaintiffs-appellants, the same can be recovered
only by due process of law by issuing a notice under Section 52 of
the Act, which has not been done in the present case. Hon'ble the
Apex Court in case Dr.G.H.Grant Vs. The State of Bihar, AIR 1966
SC 237, has laid down that there is no limitation prescribed for any
reference under Section 30 of the Act. The relevant portion of said
judgment read as follows: -