Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 26 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Madras Aluminium Co. vs Regional Labour Commissioner And Ors. on 1 July, 1998
In the case of MADRAS ALUMINIUM
COMPANY LIMITED v. LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE
AND ANOTHER (1992 II LLN 101), it has been held that any
plea or material not produced before the Court below, cannot be
sought to be introduced and tested before this Court for the first
time. In view of the above judgment, we find that the
appellant/petitioner, having failed to establish the charges
before the Labour Court, the fact finding authority, by
producing the CBI report which I sought to be introduced now
and which were very much available by that time, this Court,
Page No.17 of 21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.25880 of 2011
sitting in appeal, cannot come to a different conclusion that the
order of the learned Single Judge needs interference or the
award of the Industrial Tribunal is perverse.
1