Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.23 seconds)Section 59 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971
Section 28 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Bombay University Act, 1974
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
Ajaib Singh vs Sirhind Co-Operative ... on 10 February, 1998
Also to be borne in mind the decision of the Apex Court in Ajaib Singh v. Sirhind Co-operative Marketing-cum-Processing Service Society Limited and Anr., , wherein it has been observed that:--
The Central Bank Of India Ltd vs P.S. Rajagopalan Etc on 19 April, 1963
While giving the above ruling, the Apex Court has also considered its earlier decision in Central Bank of India Ltd. v. P.S. Rajgopalan , as well as the Full Bench decision of our High Court in Vishwanath Tukaram v. General Manager, Central Railway, V. T. Bombay . Besides, Section 32 of the said Act, on the face of it, speaks about the power of the Court to decide all matters arising out of any application or complaint referred to it for decision under any of the provisions of the Act. Apparently, the expression "all the matters" relates to the matters covered by "any of the provisions of the said Act" and not by some other Act. All matters must be for the decision under the provisions of the said Act. The matter covered by other Acts and not covered by the said Act cannot be said to be for the decision under any of the provisions of the said Act."
Viswanath Tukaram vs General Manager, Central Railway And ... on 4 July, 1957
While giving the above ruling, the Apex Court has also considered its earlier decision in Central Bank of India Ltd. v. P.S. Rajgopalan , as well as the Full Bench decision of our High Court in Vishwanath Tukaram v. General Manager, Central Railway, V. T. Bombay . Besides, Section 32 of the said Act, on the face of it, speaks about the power of the Court to decide all matters arising out of any application or complaint referred to it for decision under any of the provisions of the Act. Apparently, the expression "all the matters" relates to the matters covered by "any of the provisions of the said Act" and not by some other Act. All matters must be for the decision under the provisions of the said Act. The matter covered by other Acts and not covered by the said Act cannot be said to be for the decision under any of the provisions of the said Act."