Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax. Kanpur Etc. ... vs Chander Sen Etc on 16 July, 1986
(iii) In support of his submission the learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the decision rendered in COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, KANPUR V. CHANDER SEN (AIR 1986 SUPREME COURT 1753) to say that as per the first rule of the Hindu Succession Act modifying the rule of succession, the property of a male Hindu dying intestate shall devolve upon according to the provisions Chapter II and Class I of Schedule provides that if there is a male heir of Class I then upon the heirs mentioned in Class I of the Schedule. Accordingly, since Loganatha Mudaliar, at the relevant point of time is son of Duraisamy Mudaliar, the defendant has no legal basis to claim any share.
Prabhoo vs Doodh Nath And Ors. on 2 December, 1977
Para 32 of the said decision is also extracted hereunder:
Darshan Singh & Ors vs Gujjar Singh (Dead) By Lrs. & Ors on 8 January, 2002
'32.Yet again in Darshan Singh v. Gujjar Singh it is stated : (SCC pp.65-66, para 7)
"It is well settled that if a co-sharer is in possession of the entire property, his possession cannot be deemed to be adverse for other co-sharers unless there has been an ouster of other co-sharers."
1