Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)Section 115 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 170 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Darshan Singh on 29 October, 2003
If any authority is required for this proposition, one may refer to the decision of this court in State of Punjab v. Darshan Singh .
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Abeda Begum And Ors. on 16 June, 2005
6. Before proceeding further, it may be pointed out that an order passed under Section 152 of the Civil Procedure Code is admittedly, not an appealable order. When the revision was first taken up for hearing, it was contended that the learned Tribunal is not a court within the meaning of Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code and, therefore, no revision lies against the impugned order. As there were conflicting decisions of this court on the question as to whether a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is or is not a court subject to the revisional jurisdiction of High Court within the meaning of Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, the matter was laid before a Division Bench. By judgment and order dated 15.6.2005, passed in the said revision along with some others, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Abeda Begum , the Division Bench of this court has now held that Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is a court within the meaning of Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code. The revision has accordingly been laid before this court for disposal of the same on merit.
Section 149 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 152 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Dwaraka Das vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr on 10 February, 1999
12. In the case at hand, the learned Tribunal has, as indicated hereinabove, reversed its finding arrived at its award dated 12.11.2002, aforementioned and this was not permissible under the law. Reference, therefore, made by Mr. S. Dutta, in this regard to the case of Dwarka Das v. State of Madhya Pradesh , is not misplaced, for in Dwarka Das (supra), the Supreme Court has held and observed as follows: