Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.04 seconds)Section 12 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Mckenzie & Co. Ltd vs Its Workmen And Others on 17 October, 1958
In this
connection reliance was placed on Mckenzie & Co. Ltd. v. Its
Workmen(1). In that case the Standing Orders provided that
notice would be served on a workman by communicating the
same orally to the workman concerned and/or by affixing the
same on the company's notice-board and the company had acted
in conformity with the Standing Orders by affixing the
notices on its notice-board. It was found in that case that
the company first sent notices by registered post
acknowledgement due to the workmen concerned. When some of
the notices came back unserved the company wrote to the
secretary of the union asking for the addresses of the
workmen but the secretary gave no reply to the letter. It
was then that the company affixed the notices on the notice-
board both inside and outside the mill-gate. In those
circumstances it was held that the company did all that it
could under the Standing Orders to serve the workmen and the
affixing of the notices on the notice-board was sufficient
service.
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Indian Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. & Another vs Their Workmen(And Connected Appeals) on 15 October, 1957
It also provides
that a workman who refuses to accept any communication
addressed to him by the company will be liable to
disciplinary action for insubordination. The tribunal also
held that in the case of these workmen, a proper inquiry was
held, though in the circumstances in their absence. It
further held that such misconduct as merited dismissal under
the Standing Orders was committed by these 47 workmen. On
these findings we should have thought that the tribunal
would not have interfered with the order of dismissal, for
the case would be clearly covered by the principles
governing the limits of the tribunal's power of interference
with the findings of the managerial inquiry laid down by
this Court in Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and another v.
Their Workmen (1).
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
India General Navigation And Railway ... vs Their Workmen on 14 October, 1959
These observations have however to be read in the context of
that case, which was (i) that it was not shown in that case
that an employee merely taking part in an illegal strike was
liable to be punished with dismissal under the Standing
Orders and (ii) that there was no
(1) [1958] S.C.R. 667.
1