Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)

M/S Mayank Bidasria Memorial ... vs The Cit(E), Bhopal on 14 November, 2018

4. The Ld. CIT(E) has also rejected the registration for the reason that Form 10AB is incomplete, it is not registered under RPT Act and the genuineness of activities is not proved. All the three allegations are incorrect. Form No.10AB filed by the assessee is complete in as much as assessee has not been granted any registration u/s 5 ITA No. 198/JP/2023 A.L. Memorial Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) 12A. It was granted provisional registration vide order dt. 15.10.2021 which is on the record of CIT(E). Further when the trust came to existence only on 05.07.2021, the question of providing self-certified annual accounts of last 3 years do not arise for consideration. In fact as on 31.03.2022 it only received corpus donation of Rs.51,000/- as evident from the trust deed and the same was lying in the bank as depicted in Form No.10AB. Further since the assessee was in the initial stage of commencing its activities, it filed application for permanent registration. Hence the registration refused on the ground that Form No.10AB is incomplete is not correct. So far as registration under RPT Act, 1959 is concerned, the assessee has moved the application on 20.01.2023 in Form No.6 (copy enclosed) and it takes time to obtain registration certificate under RPT Act. Hence, on this ground also registration should not have been refused. This apart assessee was in the initial stage of starting the charitable activity out of the donation received by it as evident from the bank statement and trial balance enclosed. Therefore, refusing registration on the ground that assessee has not proved genuineness of the activity is incorrect.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Indore Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1