Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.30 seconds)
M/S. Inca Builders vs Housing & Urban Development ... on 22 February, 2012 cites

M.K. Shah Engineers And Contractors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 February, 1999

Reliance was also placed on the decisions in M.K. Shah Engineers & Contractors v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1999) 2 SCC 594 and M/s. Sudarsan Trading Co. v. Government of Kerala AIR 1989 SC 890 to urge that when no reasons have been given in an Award it is not open to the Court to probe the mental process of the arbitrator and speculate as to what impelled the Arbitrator to arrive at the conclusions. Also, an award need not formally express the decision of the arbitrator on each matter of difference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 54 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Sudarsan Trading Co vs Govt. Of Kerala & Anr on 14 February, 1989

Reliance was also placed on the decisions in M.K. Shah Engineers & Contractors v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1999) 2 SCC 594 and M/s. Sudarsan Trading Co. v. Government of Kerala AIR 1989 SC 890 to urge that when no reasons have been given in an Award it is not open to the Court to probe the mental process of the arbitrator and speculate as to what impelled the Arbitrator to arrive at the conclusions. Also, an award need not formally express the decision of the arbitrator on each matter of difference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 613 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Union Of India vs Jain Associates on 19 April, 1994

15. Referring to the proceedings of the arbitration hearings it is pointed out that HUDCO was referred to in some of them as the 'innocent party' thus reflecting the bias of the learned Arbitrator. The proceedings of the 29th, 30th and 31st sitting held on 8th April 1999, 10th April 1999 and 12th April 1999 were without the participation of the Plaintiff. The reasonable request of the counsel for the Plaintiff for adjournment on these dates was not acceded to thus further pointing to the biased approach of the learned Arbitrator. Mr. Sachdeva also placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Jain Associates (1994) 4 SCC 655 as regards the interpretation of the word 'misconduct' in Section 30 (a) of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 22 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1