Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (3.26 seconds)

Prithu @ Priti Chand & Anr vs State Of H.P on 18 February, 2009

SCC 588 titled Prithu Chand and another Vs. State of HP, see 2009 (9) SCC 626 titled State of UP Vs. Santosh Kumar and others, see AIR 2009 SC 151 titled State Vs. Saravanan and another, see AIR 1988 SC 696 titled Appabhai and another Vs. of State of Gujarat, see AIR 1999 SC 3544 titled Rammi Vs. State of M.P, see 2000(1) SCC 247 titled State of H.P. Vs. Lekh Raj and another, see 2004 (10) SCC 94 titled Laxman Vs. rt Poonam Singh and others also See 2004 (7) SCC 408 titled Dashrath Singh Vs. State of UP. See 2012 (10) SCC 433 titled Kuriya and another Vs. State of Rajasthan. It is well settled law that concept falsus in uno falsus in omnibus is not applicable in criminal case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 83 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of U.P vs Santosh Kumar & Ors on 3 September, 2009

SCC 588 titled Prithu Chand and another Vs. State of HP, see 2009 (9) SCC 626 titled State of UP Vs. Santosh Kumar and others, see AIR 2009 SC 151 titled State Vs. Saravanan and another, see AIR 1988 SC 696 titled Appabhai and another Vs. of State of Gujarat, see AIR 1999 SC 3544 titled Rammi Vs. State of M.P, see 2000(1) SCC 247 titled State of H.P. Vs. Lekh Raj and another, see 2004 (10) SCC 94 titled Laxman Vs. rt Poonam Singh and others also See 2004 (7) SCC 408 titled Dashrath Singh Vs. State of UP. See 2012 (10) SCC 433 titled Kuriya and another Vs. State of Rajasthan. It is well settled law that concept falsus in uno falsus in omnibus is not applicable in criminal case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 102 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 3 Next