Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.32 seconds)Article 370 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
V.K. Ramamurthy vs Union Of India on 13 August, 1996
32. Sri Arvind Vashisth, learned Senior Counsel relied on the
judgment in the case of V.K. Ramamurthy vs. Union of India and
another reported in (1996) 10 SCC 73, where the Court was
concerned with a Railway employee not opting for pension despite six
chances and deliberately chose to continue in the Provident Fund
Scheme. The Court took the view that the employee was not entitled
to exercise his option to come over the pension scheme. In the course
33
of the judgment, no doubt, the Court did observe that under the
Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, the employees would get in
lump sum, which they were at liberty to invest in a manner that would
yield optimum return and that relation would come to an end on their
retirement in the case of Contributory Provident Fund, but that was
not the case under the Pension Scheme.