Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.94 seconds)Section 235 in The Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Bhagaban Gouda vs Ukia Dei on 20 August, 1974
9. Whether the service tenure is liable for partition would depend upon nature of the tenure and terms of the grant. This has been laid down in the decision reported in ILR (1950) Cut 561 :(AIR 1951 Orissa 240) (SB) (Raja Brajasundar Deb and after him Raja Chandrabhanu Deb v. Binodc Rout and followed in ILR (1974) Cut 909 : (AIR 1975 Orissa 139) (Bhagabas Gouda v. Ukia Dei).
Biseswar Giri vs Haraprasad Behera And Ors. on 14 September, 1966
He also relied upon the decision reported in (1967) 33 Cut LT 725 : (AIR 1967 Orissa 86) (Bineswar Giri v. Haraprasad Behera) and submitted that a purchaser relying upon transferable right of his vendor is to prove the requirements of Section 236 (1) of the Act. It reads as follows:--
Madhu Sethi And Anr. vs Bishnu Sethi And Ors. on 19 April, 1982
15. order to highlight his submission, learned counsel relied upon the decision of this Court in S. A. 420 of 1965 decided on 24-3-1970 (Notoi Sethi v. Jadu Sethi and others) where it has been held that Deshahata Jagir is granted to a person for service to a community and not to the exintermediary and accordingly, there is no scope for any tenancy right under Section 8( I) of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act.
Hari Behera vs Harikrishna Kantha on 4 August, 1949
12. Learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the decision reported in ILR (1949) 1 Cut 652 : (AIR 1950 Orissa 61) Hari Behera v. Harekrishna Kantha and ILR (1962) Cut 191 (Kunja Rout v. Radhu Moharana) and submitted that a tenant is to establish that in his homestead he ordinarily resides to bring it within the scope of Section 236(i) of the Act as substituted in 1946.
Section 237 in The Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
1