Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.33 seconds)Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
All Cargo Movers (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Dhanesh Badarmal Jain & Anr on 12 October, 2007
12.1. At this juncture, it would be appropriate to consider the decision rendered in All Cargo Moves (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain and Another reported in 2007 (14) SCC 776, wherein at paragraph 16 it was held as follows:-
Vijayander Kumar & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 11 February, 2014
20.1. The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court made in the case of Vijayander Kumar and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Another reported in CDJ 2014 SC 109 and submits that if a complaint make out both civil as well as a criminal offence and only because a civil remedy may also be available to the complainant, that itself cannot be a ground to quash a criminal proceeding. It would be appropriate to incorporate paragraphs 12 and 13 of the said decision:
Hridaya Rangan Pd. Verma And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 31 March, 2000
10. At this juncture, it is also appropriate to consider the decision in Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma and Others vs. State of Bihar and Another reported in (2000) 4 Supreme Court Cases 168, wherein, this Court has held as follows:
Priyanka Srivastava & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 19 March, 2015
In the decision made in Priyanka Srivastava and Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2015 (6) SCC 287, in paragraph 31, it was held as follows:
Ramdev Food Products Private Limited vs State Of Gujarat on 16 March, 2015
In the decision made in Ramdev Food Products P. Ltd., vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2015 (6) SCC 439, it was held that direction for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C is to be issued only after application of mind by the Magistrate. It is appropriate to incorporate paragraph 22.1 of the said decision: