Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.51 seconds)Neeraj Malik vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 18 August, 2006
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court, reported as "Neeraj Malik v. State of Haryana and Ors. 2007(1) R.S.J. 235" to contend that the Rules applicable on the date of death, would be applicable. However, operation of the said judgment has been stayed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 13.7.2007 in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 18972 of 2006.
I.G. (Karmik) & Ors vs Prahalad Mani Tripathi on 27 April, 2007
7. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, we do not find any merit in the present writ petition. The State Government has trained the 2003 Rules, 2005 Rules and 2006 Rules in terms of proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India providing appointment of compassionate ground. Therefore, the appointment on compassionate ground can be sought only in accordance with the Rules framed from time to time. The appointment on compassionate ground is a concession granted to the family of the deceased Government employee to meet out immediate financial distress. It is well settled that it is not a source of employment. The purpose of granting compassionate appointment is not the replacement for the deceased employee. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in I.G. (Karmik) v. Prahalad Mani Tripathi , has held that the public employment is considered to be a wealth and cannot be given on descent. It was held to the following effect:
State Bank Of India & Anr vs Somvir Singh on 13 February, 2007
In "State Bank of India and Anr. v. Somvir Singh ", the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that indiscriminate grant of employment on compassionate ground would shut the door for employment to the ever-growing population of employed youths. It proceeded to hold that:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1