Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.19 seconds)
Sajan Varghese vs Union Of India on 27 October, 2010 cites

Kanu Biswas vs State Of West Bengal on 3 May, 1972

"7. The question whether a man has only committed a breach of law and order or has acted in a manner likely to cause a disturbance of the public order, according to the dictum laid down in the above case, is a question of degree and the extent of the reach of the act upon the society. Public order is what the French call "order publique" and is something more than ordinary maintenance of law and order. The test to be adopted in determining whether an act affects law and order or public order, as laid down in the above case, is: Does it lead to disturbance of the current of life of the community so as to amount to a disturbance of the public order or does it affect merely an individual leaving the tranquillity of the society undisturbed?"
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 634 - H R Khanna - Full Document

Pushpadevi M. Jatia vs M.L. Wadhavan, Addl. Secretary ... on 29 April, 1987

15. The next contention on behalf of the detenu, assailing the detention order on the plea that there is a difference between "law and order" and "public order" cannot also be sustained since this Court in a series of decisions recognised that public order is the even tempo of life of the community taking the country as a whole or even a specified locality. [Vide WPC No.21095 of 2017 10 Pushpadevi M. Jatia v. M.L. Wadhawan1, SCC paras 11 & 14;
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 100 - A P Sen - Full Document

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia vs State Of Bihar And Others on 7 September, 1965

Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar2; Union of India v. Arvind Shergill3, SCC paras 4 & 6; Sunil Fulchand Shah v. Union of India4, SCC para 28 (Constitution Bench); Commr. of Police v. C. Anita5, SCC paras 5, 7 & 13.] Public order is a matter which comes under Entry I of List II of the 7th Schedule. As noted above, Entry 31 of List I of the 7th Schedule deals with "Posts and telegraphs; telephones, wireless, broadcasting and other like forms of communication". The said entries essentially deal with the licensing of telecasting and other rights. None of the matters sought to be inquired into in terms of Ext.P6 notification falls, therefore, under Entry 31 of List I. The issue is, therefore, answered against the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 2627 - A K Sarkar - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Arvind Shergill & Anr on 13 September, 2000

Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar2; Union of India v. Arvind Shergill3, SCC paras 4 & 6; Sunil Fulchand Shah v. Union of India4, SCC para 28 (Constitution Bench); Commr. of Police v. C. Anita5, SCC paras 5, 7 & 13.] Public order is a matter which comes under Entry I of List II of the 7th Schedule. As noted above, Entry 31 of List I of the 7th Schedule deals with "Posts and telegraphs; telephones, wireless, broadcasting and other like forms of communication". The said entries essentially deal with the licensing of telecasting and other rights. None of the matters sought to be inquired into in terms of Ext.P6 notification falls, therefore, under Entry 31 of List I. The issue is, therefore, answered against the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 71 - Full Document

Sunil Fulchand Shah vs Union Of India And Ors on 16 February, 2000

Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar2; Union of India v. Arvind Shergill3, SCC paras 4 & 6; Sunil Fulchand Shah v. Union of India4, SCC para 28 (Constitution Bench); Commr. of Police v. C. Anita5, SCC paras 5, 7 & 13.] Public order is a matter which comes under Entry I of List II of the 7th Schedule. As noted above, Entry 31 of List I of the 7th Schedule deals with "Posts and telegraphs; telephones, wireless, broadcasting and other like forms of communication". The said entries essentially deal with the licensing of telecasting and other rights. None of the matters sought to be inquired into in terms of Ext.P6 notification falls, therefore, under Entry 31 of List I. The issue is, therefore, answered against the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 259 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Police And Ors vs Smt. C. Anita on 23 August, 2004

Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar2; Union of India v. Arvind Shergill3, SCC paras 4 & 6; Sunil Fulchand Shah v. Union of India4, SCC para 28 (Constitution Bench); Commr. of Police v. C. Anita5, SCC paras 5, 7 & 13.] Public order is a matter which comes under Entry I of List II of the 7th Schedule. As noted above, Entry 31 of List I of the 7th Schedule deals with "Posts and telegraphs; telephones, wireless, broadcasting and other like forms of communication". The said entries essentially deal with the licensing of telecasting and other rights. None of the matters sought to be inquired into in terms of Ext.P6 notification falls, therefore, under Entry 31 of List I. The issue is, therefore, answered against the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 138 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next