Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.85 seconds)Section 115JB in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
M/S. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd., New ... vs Acit, New Delhi on 16 June, 2017
8. We have considered the rival submissions of both the parties and have gone through
the orders of lower authorities carefully. We have also deliberated on the decision of
Co-ordinate Bench of Tribunal in assessee's own case for A.Y. 2008-09 to 2013-14 and
in A.Y. 2017-18. On careful perusal of such order and the finding of lower authorities,
we find that these grounds of appeal are covered in favour of assessee, wherein on
similar set of fact, the suo moto disallowance under section 14A of assessee was
accepted. We further find that disallowance made under section 14A is not to be added
for the purpose of computing book profit under section 11538 as has been held by
Special Bench of Delhi Tribunal in ACIT vs Vireet Investments Ltd. (SB). We find that
Id. CIT(A) was allowing relief to the assessee has followed the decision of Tribunal on
similar set of fact. No contrary facts or law in brought to our notice to take other view.
In the result, ground no. 1, 2 and 6 to 8 are dismissed.
Section 250 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Engineering Analysis Centre Of ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax on 2 March, 2021
17. We have considered the rival submissions of both the parties and perused the
material on record. We have already recorded the finding of AO and CIT(A) in
preceding paras. The Id. AR of the assessee vehemently argued that the discount given
by the assessee on sale of gift card that crystallised as soon as the gift cards are shown
and not contingent upon the future sales of the assessee. In case the gift card is not
utilised, the entire amount of 1000 received is being offered to tax by the assessee in
the year when in which it is unutilised. We find that Hon'ble Apex Court in Taparia
Tools Ltd. (supra) held that normally the ordinary rule is to be applied, namely
revenue expenditure incurred in a particular year is to be allowed in that year. If the
assessee claims that expenditure in that year, the revenue department cannot denied
the same. Thus, following the same principle and the fact that assessee is crediting the
amount of unutilised gift card and gift voucher after the expiry of period if the same
are not increased. Hence, we set aside the order of lower authorities and allow relief
to the assessee. In the result, ground no. 4 to 7 are allowed.
The Peerless Gen.Fin And Investment ... vs Commnr. Of Income Tax on 9 July, 2019
(f) Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT [2018] 402 ITR 640 (SC)
M/S Godrej Investment Pvt. Ltd. (Now ... vs Dcit 14(1)(2), Mumbai on 26 November, 2021
(g) Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. DCIT [2017]
394 ITR 449 (SC)
Finance Act, 2012
1