Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (1.06 seconds)Nanjappa vs State Of Karnataka on 24 July, 2015
14. Short question, which false for consideration by this Court, is whether the evidence led in the trial of Case No.04 of 2001, which case got dismissed on the finding recorded by the learned trial Court that the sanction order for prosecution of the accused-applicant under Section 19 of the PC Act was improper and invalid, can be taken/read in the subsequent trial in Case No.502 of 2016. The Supreme Court in the case of Nanjappa V. State of Karnataka (supra) was dealing with the issue that whether the trial, after proper sanction, would amount to double jeopardy or not. The question regarding applicability of Section 33 of the Evidence Act was not involved in the said case. It cannot be said that the evidence, recorded in trial of Case No.04 of 2001, was not in judicial proceedings. The proceedings of earlier trial and subsequent trial both are judicial proceedings.