Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.24 seconds)
M/S.Tri Infra Studio Pvt. Limited vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 23 September, 2025 cites

Registrar Of Assurances vs Asl Vyapar Private Ltd. on 10 November, 2022

9. In view of the above categoric pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court we conclude that the impugned action of the Sub-Registrar viz., the 3rd respondent are unwarranted and against law. The learned Single Judge however dismissed the writ petition at the admission stage itself and concluded that it will be open to the petitioner to raise all the issues in the 47-A 15/18 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/10/2025 08:32:21 pm ) W.P(MD)No.1064 of 2025 proceedings. Unfortunately the attention of the learned Single Judge was not drawn to the recent pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Registrar of Assurances and another Vs. ASL VYAPAR Private Ltd. & another (supra). Hence, we are forced to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 7 - S K Kaul - Full Document

M/S Esjaypee Impex Private Limited vs The Asst. General Manager And ... on 11 September, 2020

“25. From the above discussion, it could be seen that in view of the pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara Bank, the law as it stands today is that an Authorised Officer, who conducts a sale under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, would be a Revenue Officer and the certificate issued by him in evidence of such sale, would be a document which is not compulsorily registrable under Section 17(2)(xii) of the Registration Act. It would be sufficient, if the document is lodged with the Registrar under Section 89(4) to be filed by him in the Book-I maintained by him.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 23 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next