Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.22 seconds)Section 40 in The M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Pt. Madan Swaroop Shrotiya Public ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 18 January, 2000
16. The Apex Court in Pt. Madanswaroop Shrotiya Public Charitable Trust v. State of U.P., , has held that all proceedings relating to any order made or purported to be made under the Principal Act pending immediately before the commencement of the Act, before any Court, Tribunal or other authority shall abate. The facts of this case are distinguishable. However, in my opinion, as discussed above, the matter can not be remitted back as per Section 4 of the Repeal Act.
Section 4 in The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976 [Entire Act]
Section 40A in The M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin ... vs State Of J&K And Ors. on 11 September, 1996
11. The said order was assailed in a Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench which was dismissed on the ground of delay. S.L.P. that was preferred before the Apex Court was also dismissed on the ground of delay. After the SLP was dismissed an application for review was filed by the Registrar of the Tribunal. Various allegations were made. After the abolition of the Tribunal building and staff of the Tribunal were brought under the control of the High Court and the Registrar of the High Court got himself impleaded in the application for review. The review application was heard at length and relying on the decisions rendered in the cases Chander Chinar Bada Akhada Udasin Society and Ors. v. State of J&K and Ors., ; Gopabandhu Biswal v. Krishna Chandra Mohanty and Ors., ; Kunhayammed and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr., ; Pt. Madan Swaroop Shrotiya Public Charitable Trust v. State of U.P. and Ors., ; Parisian Devi and Ors. v. Sumitri Devi and Ors., and Ramprasad and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors., 2002(5) MPLJ 417, this Court came to hold in Paragraphs 25 and 26 as under :--