Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)

Nepc Micon Limited And Others vs Magma Leasing Limited on 29 April, 1999

13. The accused did not deny receipt of the legal notice and rather in his cross­examination, the accused admitted receiving legal notices from the complainant demanding the amount due as alleged in the present case and also admitted that he did not send any reply to said legal notice. Thus despite service of the legal notice upon the accused he failed to repay the amount within fifteen days of receipt of the legal notice . The Bank's endorsement of 'account closed' vide the return memo Ex. CW1/2 attracts the punishment U/s 138 NI Act in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'NEPC Micon Ltd. Vs. Magma Leasing Ltd' AIR 1999 SC 1952 wherein it was observed as under:­ "...Hence when the cheque is returned by a bank with an endorsement a/c closed it would amount to returning the cheque unpaid because the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque".
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 392 - M B Shah - Full Document
1