Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)Section 99 in Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909 [Entire Act]
The Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Section 25 in The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 6 in Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909 [Entire Act]
Firm Mukand Lal Veer Kumar & Anr vs Sri Purushottam Singh & Ors on 31 January, 1968
12. The Supreme Court in the case of Firm Mukund Lal v. Purushottam Singh : (1968) 2 S.C.J. 639 : (1968) 2 S.C.A. 461, declined to accept the act of one of the partners as an act on behalf of the partners of the firm and thus on behalf of the firm for the reason that the property of which Mukand Lai was alleged to have made a gift to Veer Kumar was not partnership property and there was no collective act of insolvency alleged on behalf of all the partners of the firm.
Section 25 in Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909 [Entire Act]
Chanahalu Siva Reddi And Anr. vs The Official Receiver Of Bellary And ... on 25 August, 1936
In another case under the Provincial Insolvency Act, a Bench of this Court in Siva Reddy v. The Official Receiver of Bellary 71 M.L.J. 730 : A.I.R. 1937 Mad. 13 : 1936 M.W.N. 1040 : 44 L.W. 651 : 166 I.C. 80, said,
Where in insolvency a partnership was proved to have existed among three brothers of a joint family and hence the acts of one of them in exclusive control of the business as agent were sufficient to implicate the other two in insolvency.