Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.66 seconds)M.O. Shamsudhin vs State Of Kerala on 21 March, 1995
In this connection, reference may be made to a judgment of the Supreme Court in M. O. Shamsudhin v. State of Kerala (1995) 3 JT (SC) 367 : 1995 AIR SCW 2717.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 357 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
S. Gopa Kumar vs State Of Kerala & Kerala Public Service ... on 21 September, 1981
17. As regards the motive, the learned Counsel submitted that in view of the evidence of the two eyewitnesses, the motive pales into insignificance and was not relevant. He submitted that motive was not the sine qua non for conviction. In this connection, he placed reliance on a judgment of the Supreme Court in Krishna Pillai Sree. Kumar v. State of Kerala, 1981 SCC (Cri) 669 : 1981 Cri LJ 743 and a judgment of this Court in Chandan Singh v. State of Haryana 1993 (1) Rec Cri R 509.
Chandan Ratra vs State Of Haryana on 6 December, 1995
17. As regards the motive, the learned Counsel submitted that in view of the evidence of the two eyewitnesses, the motive pales into insignificance and was not relevant. He submitted that motive was not the sine qua non for conviction. In this connection, he placed reliance on a judgment of the Supreme Court in Krishna Pillai Sree. Kumar v. State of Kerala, 1981 SCC (Cri) 669 : 1981 Cri LJ 743 and a judgment of this Court in Chandan Singh v. State of Haryana 1993 (1) Rec Cri R 509.
1