Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)
Union Of India And Others vs Ex Nk Kuldeep Singh And Another on 17 December, 2024 cites

U.O.I And Anr vs Surender Singh Parmar on 20 January, 2015

12. Consequently, the cumulative effect of the authoritative judicial pronouncement as carried in the above extracted paragraph, made in Surender Singh Parmar's case (supra), thus completely countervails both the supra arguments raised before this Court, by the counsel for the petitioners, thus for denying to the respondent, the benefit of the service pension for his serving in the DSC, merely on the ground that he has not completed the qualifying period of service, 7 of 8 ::: Downloaded on - 21-12-2024 20:40:15 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:169426-DB CWP-31300-2024 [8] besides on the further flimsy ground, that only the competent authority is authorized to condone the said shortfall.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 16 - S J Mukhopadhaya - Full Document

Sham Kaur vs Union Of India And Ors on 28 October, 2014

11. Therefore, the judicial verdict (supra), does render negated the supra argument raised by the counsel for the petitioners, that the empowerment to condone the requisite shortfall, becomes solitarily vested in the Competent Authority, especially when the hereinabove underlined paragraphs, as occur in the verdict made in Surender Singh Parmar's case, alluded to in the verdict made in Shama Kaur's case, do invest jurisdiction in the Writ Court, to through judicial intervention, thus make the espoused condonation.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - K Kannan - Full Document
1