Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.44 seconds)Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Northern Indian Glass Industries vs Jaswant Singh And Ors on 29 October, 2002
20. In the backdrop of the aforesaid discussion and contentions
advanced by learned counsel for the parties and bearing in mind
the concept of equity jurisdiction of this Court under Article
226/227 of the Constitution of India, this Court is of the firm
opinion that no interference is warranted in this writ petition
seeking quashment of notification dated 04/08/1998 under
section 4(1) of the Act of 1894; Award dated 07/09/2001 passed
by the Land Acquisition Officer; cancellation of the lease deed
(Annexure A/3) executed by respondent No.3 in favour of
respondent No.4, filed in the year 2016 at a distance of time of
more than 18 years. The view taken by this Court finds support
from the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Northern
India Glass Industries Vs. Jaswant Singh and others AIR
2003 SC 234, Chairman and M.D.B.P.L.Ltd., Vs. S.P.Gururaja
and others AIR 2003 SC 4536 and Jasveer Singh and another
Vs. State of U.P. (2017) 6 SCC 787.
Section 34 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Pune Municipalc Corp.& Anr vs Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors on 24 January, 2014
Moreover, after the petitioner failed to respond to the
aforesaid notice, he was not entitled to receive compensation
and, therefore, the stage of giving consent did not arise. As such,
none of the contingencies, as contemplated under section 31 of
the Act of 1894, had arisen obligating the Collector to deposit the
amount of compensation in the Court. Under such circumstances,
the ratio of decision in Pune Municipal Corporation Vs.
Harakchand Misrimal Solanki ((2014)3 SCC 183) and
16 W.P.No.1126/2016
subsequent judgments of the Supreme Court and a Division
Bench judgment of this Court relied upon by the petitioner; (a)
Union of India and others Vs. Shivraj and others, (2014) 6
SCC 564; (b) Pune Municipal Corporation and another Vs.
Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and others, (2014) 3 SCC 183;