Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 44 (0.34 seconds)Section 17A in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Monnet Ispat And Energy Ltd vs Union Of India And Ors on 26 July, 2012
40. It is well settled that no one has legal or vested right for
the grant of mining lease. Mere disappointment of expectation cannot be a
ground for interfering with the policy of the State reserving the areas for
exploitation of beach sand mineral by State/Central Public Sector
Undertakings. After referring to various judgments on the doctrine of
promissory estoppel, in Monnet Ispat case, this Court has summarized the
principles in paragraph (182) as under:-
Section 17 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Snndur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 13 September, 2010
In Sandur Manganese And Iron Ores Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka &
Ors., (2010) 13 SCC 1 para (95), it was held as under:-