Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (2.10 seconds)Section 353 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Anil Singh on 26 August, 1988
and against judgement and order dated 30.09.2014 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 7, Meerut in Criminal Case No. 3392 of 2010 (State of U.P. Vs. Anil), arising out of Case Crime No. 165 of 2006, under Sections 332, 353 I.P.C., Police Station Railway Road, District Meerut by which the revisionist-accused has been convicted and sentenced under Sections 332 I.P.C. to six months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to seven days simple imprisonment, under Section 353 I.P.C. to six months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to seven days simple imprisonment. The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. The trial court has further directed that the period of detention undergone by the accused be set off against the sentence of conviction.
Anil Kumar Gupta, Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on 28 July, 1995
2. Against the said judgement and order of conviction dated 30.09.2014, the accused preferred an appeal which was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 317 of 2014 (Anil Vs. State of U.P.) which has been dismissed vide judgement and order dated 28.07.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 16, Meerut.
Anil Kumar & Others vs State Of U.P. & Others on 25 November, 2011
1. The present criminal revision has been preferred against judgement and order dated 28.07.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 16, Meerut in Criminal Appeal No. 317 of 2014, under Sections 332, 3453 I.P.C. (Anil and others Vs. State of U.P.)
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1