Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.34 seconds)Section 10 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
S.P Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath on 27 October, 1993
46. The plaintiff by suppressing the material facts pertaining to the
pending litigations inter-se the parties herein qua the suit properties has not
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:MAMTA RANI CS(OS) 7/2025 Page 29 of 30
only misled the court but has also played fraud upon this Court. Thus, in
view of the aforesaid and the law settled by the Supreme Court in S.P.
Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (supra) and Sopan Sukhdeo Sable
and Others v. Assistant Charity Commissioner and Others (supra), the
plaint is held to be not maintainable and is accordingly liable to be rejected
under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC.
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors vs Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors on 23 January, 2004
46. The plaintiff by suppressing the material facts pertaining to the
pending litigations inter-se the parties herein qua the suit properties has not
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:MAMTA RANI CS(OS) 7/2025 Page 29 of 30
only misled the court but has also played fraud upon this Court. Thus, in
view of the aforesaid and the law settled by the Supreme Court in S.P.
Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (supra) and Sopan Sukhdeo Sable
and Others v. Assistant Charity Commissioner and Others (supra), the
plaint is held to be not maintainable and is accordingly liable to be rejected
under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC.
Som Nath Kalra vs Deepa Kalra & Ors. on 14 August, 2023
18.6. As per Section 10 of CPC, a suit is liable to be stayed, where the
matter in issue is directly and substantially in question in a previously
instituted suit between the same parties. However, since no summons have
been issued in this suit following the dicta of Som Nath Kalra v. Deepa
Signature Not Verified
15
2024:DHC:7734 [Paragraph nos.
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 54 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
T. Arivandandam vs T. V. Satyapal & Another on 14 October, 1977
In support of the maintainability of the present suit, he relied upon the
judgment of the Supreme Court in T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal7,
and contended that the said decision mandates dismissal only where the suit
is ex facie frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process. He stated that the
present suit is not mala fide, but is based on registered conveyances, and
while there may have been certain omissions in the pleadings, the
substantive claim is genuine and bona fide.